Should the legal drinking age be lowered to 18? Should Lewis & Clark College ban smoking on campus? What risks or benefits does legalized marijuana present for Oregon? Is vaping safer than cigarettes? These are the types of questions about drug and alcohol use that we face as a society.  But how do we answer them? Scientific journals, the popular press, and the internet are awash in information (good, bad, and very bad) that can help shape our opinions and decisions. But how do we make use of it? How can we separate the good information from the bad? 
This section will focus on one of the key features of being a literate and active member of a democracy: the ability to locate, think about, and make arguments with data. While we will indeed use numbers to explore the scientific and social ramifications of alcohol and substance use, this will not be a “math” class in the conventional sense. Nor, it must be said, will this be a “humanities” class in the conventional sense. We will likely spend less time dissecting texts than other E&D sections, or at least not in the same way. Instead, we will think about how quantitative reasoning can shape and strengthen arguments about academic research, public policy, literature, and the choices we make in our daily lives.
This section will focus on one of the key features of being a literate and active member of a democracy: the ability to locate, think about, and make arguments with data. While we will indeed use numbers to explore the scientific and social ramifications of alcohol and substance use, this will not be a “math” class in the conventional sense. Nor, it must be said, will this be a “humanities” class in the conventional sense. We will likely spend less time dissecting texts than other E&D sections, or at least not in the same way. Instead, we will think about how quantitative reasoning can shape and strengthen arguments about academic research, public policy, literature, and the choices we make in our daily lives.
- Teacher: Todd Watson
 
Category: Spring 2016